In re the Estate of Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Farrell

75 A.D.2d 619, 426 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11081

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 75 A.D.2d 619 (In re the Estate of Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Farrell, 75 A.D.2d 619, 426 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In proceedings (1) for a judicial [620]*620settlement of a final account and (2) to vacate and set aside a court decree settling an intermediate account, the appeals are from two orders of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, both dated May 4, 1979, which after a hearing, inter alia, directed the appellant to amend (1) his intermediate account and (2) his final account. Orders affirmed, with one bill of costs to cover both appeals, payable by the appellant. In affirming, we have not considered the issue, raised by the petitioners for the first time before this court, whether the citation in the proceeding to judicially settle the intermediate account of the appellant was properly served. Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In proceedings (1) for a judicial [620]*620settlement of a final account and (2) to vacate and set aside a court decree settling an intermediate account, the appeals are from two orders of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, both dated May 4, 1979, which after a hearing, inter alia, directed the appellant to amend (1) his intermediate account and (2) his final account. Orders affirmed, with one bill of costs to cover both appeals, payable by the appellant. In affirming, we have not considered the issue, raised by the petitioners for the first time before this court, whether the citation in the proceeding to judicially settle the intermediate account of the appellant was properly served. Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 A.D.2d 619, 426 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-farrell-nyappdiv-1980.