In re the Estate of Fantel

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Estate of Fantel

13 Misc. 2d 1, 177 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2731

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedSeptember 9, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 Misc. 2d 1 (In re the Estate of Fantel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Fantel, 13 Misc. 2d 1, 177 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2731 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

John D. Bennett, S.

The applicants, the executors of this estate, seek by notice of motion the substitution of a new attorney for the estate, the fixation of the fees of the former attorney for the estate, and the delivery of all estate papers and records held by such former attorney.

There appears to be no proceeding pending in this court in which a substitution of attorneys could be effected. The petitioner is evidently unaware that in the absence of a pending proceeding he is not obliged to ask for a substitution of attorneys, but may discharge his attorney at any time. The proceeding to fix attorney’s fees should not have been commenced by a notice of motion to the persons interested. It is just as irregular to do so as to commence an action in the Supreme Court or other forum by notice of motion, rather than by service of a summons.” (Matter of Dix, 144 Misc. 494, 495; see, [2]*2also, Matter of Fagan, 8 Misc 2d 1029; Matter of Rosenberg, 157 Misc. 490, 496.)

The applicants may by a section 231-a proceeding of the Surrogate’s Court Act have the fees of the former attorney for the estate fixed, thereby freeing estate papers and records held by him of any retaining lien.

Motion denied.

Submit order on five days’ notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John D. Bennett, S.

The applicants, the executors of this estate, seek by notice of motion the substitution of a new attorney for the estate, the fixation of the fees of the former attorney for the estate, and the delivery of all estate papers and records held by such former attorney.

There appears to be no proceeding pending in this court in which a substitution of attorneys could be effected. The petitioner is evidently unaware that in the absence of a pending proceeding he is not obliged to ask for a substitution of attorneys, but may discharge his attorney at any time. The proceeding to fix attorney’s fees should not have been commenced by a notice of motion to the persons interested. It is just as irregular to do so as to commence an action in the Supreme Court or other forum by notice of motion, rather than by service of a summons.” (Matter of Dix, 144 Misc. 494, 495; see, [2]*2also, Matter of Fagan, 8 Misc 2d 1029; Matter of Rosenberg, 157 Misc. 490, 496.)

The applicants may by a section 231-a proceeding of the Surrogate’s Court Act have the fees of the former attorney for the estate fixed, thereby freeing estate papers and records held by him of any retaining lien.

Motion denied.

Submit order on five days’ notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Misc. 2d 1, 177 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-fantel-nysurct-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack