In re the Estate of Falanga

245 N.E.2d 802, 23 N.Y.2d 860, 298 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1637
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 9, 1969·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. In so doing we simply hold that the determination revoking letters of administration was proper. We reach no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Soileppi, Bergan, Breitbl and Jasen. Judge Keating dissents and votes to reverse on the Surrogate’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Falanga, 245 N.E.2d 802, 23 N.Y.2d 860, 298 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1637 (N.Y. 1969).

245 N.E.2d 802 (In re the Estate of Falanga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ullmann-Schneider v. Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C.
121 A.D.3d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Galasso v. Galasso
109 Misc. 2d 850 (NYC Family Court, 1981)
In re the Estate of Wilson
66 A.D.2d 893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)