In Re the Estate of Evans

244 P. 260, 138 Wash. 101, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 1078
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 18, 1926
DocketNo. 19762. Department Two.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 244 P. 260 (In Re the Estate of Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Estate of Evans, 244 P. 260, 138 Wash. 101, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 1078 (Wash. 1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Evan Evans died in October, 1924, leaving a will in which he appointed an attorney as the executor of his estate, which consisted of cash, bonds, stocks and mortgages. The executor employed another *102 attorney to act for him in the settlement of the estate. On the settlement of the' final account and distribution, the executor was allowed $3,500 as his fee, and his attorney was allowed $550. This appeal is based upon the refusal to allow a greater amount to the attorney for his services.

Under § 1528, Bern. Comp. Stat., the executor or administrator of an estate, even though he may be an attorney, may employ an attorney to assist in the settlement of the estate, provided “it is necessary.” An examination of the record in this case is convincing that the allowance made to the attorney is sufficient to cover all the services which it was necessary to be performed by any one other than the executor himself'.'

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seibert v. McClure
12 Wash. 2d 643 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
In Re Belknap's Estate
123 P.2d 358 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
Jones v. Peabody
45 P.2d 915 (Washington Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 P. 260, 138 Wash. 101, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 1078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-evans-wash-1926.