In Re the Estate of Evans

244 P. 260, 138 Wash. 101, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 1078
Washington Supreme Court·Decided March 18, 1926·No. No. 19762. Department Two.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Evan Evans died in October, 1924, leaving a will in which he appointed an attorney as the executor of his estate, which consisted of cash, bonds, stocks and mortgages. The executor employed another *102 attorney to act for him in the settlement of the estate. On the settlement of the' final account and distribution, the executor was allowed $3,500 as his fee, and his attorney was allowed $550. This appeal is based upon the refusal to allow a greater amount to the attorney for his services.

Under § 1528, Bern. Comp. Stat., the executor or administrator of an estate, even though he may be an attorney, may employ an attorney to assist in the settlement of the estate, provided “it is necessary.” An examination of the record in this case is convincing that the allowance made to the attorney is sufficient to cover all the services which it was necessary to be performed by any one other than the executor himself'.'

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Estate of Evans, 244 P. 260, 138 Wash. 101, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 1078 (Wash. 1926).

244 P. 260 (In Re the Estate of Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seibert v. McClure
12 Wash. 2d 643 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
In Re Belknap's Estate
123 P.2d 358 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
Jones v. Peabody
45 P.2d 915 (Washington Supreme Court, 1935)