In re the Estate of Dupuy

New York Court of Appeals

In re the Estate of Dupuy

247 N.E.2d 283, 23 N.Y.2d 1013, 299 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1491

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 27, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order insofar as it affirmed the decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, entered October 10, 1966, affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate. Appeals from so much of the order as modified the decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, entered May 3, 1967, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Ftjld and Judges Burke, Bergan, Keating, Bkeitel and Jasen. Taking no part: Judge Soileppi.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order insofar as it affirmed the decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, entered October 10, 1966, affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate. Appeals from so much of the order as modified the decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, entered May 3, 1967, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Ftjld and Judges Burke, Bergan, Keating, Bkeitel and Jasen. Taking no part: Judge Soileppi.

In re the Estate of Dupuy, 247 N.E.2d 283, 23 N.Y.2d 1013, 299 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1491 (N.Y. 1969).

Pincite

247 N.E.2d 283 (In re the Estate of Dupuy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related