In re the Estate of DeRosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of DeRosa

138 A.D.2d 486, 526 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2834

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.2d 486 (In re the Estate of DeRosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of DeRosa, 138 A.D.2d 486, 526 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding for the appointment of an administrator of the estate of Carlo N. DeRosa, also known as Carlo Nick DeRosa, the objectants appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Laurino, S.), dated January 31, 1985, which, after a nonjury trial, ordered that letters of administration issue to Judith A. DeRosa, the decedent’s surviving spouse.

[487]*487Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The objectants in this proceeding raised a challenge to the decision of the Surrogate’s Court to issue letters of administration to the petitioner, the decedent’s surviving spouse. The parties herein, however, conceded during the oral argument in this proceeding that the letters of administration in dispute had been revoked by a subsequent order of the Surrogate’s Court. Accordingly, the instant appeal is academic. Kunzeman, J. P., Eiber, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding for the appointment of an administrator of the estate of Carlo N. DeRosa, also known as Carlo Nick DeRosa, the objectants appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Laurino, S.), dated January 31, 1985, which, after a nonjury trial, ordered that letters of administration issue to Judith A. DeRosa, the decedent’s surviving spouse.

[487]*487Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The objectants in this proceeding raised a challenge to the decision of the Surrogate’s Court to issue letters of administration to the petitioner, the decedent’s surviving spouse. The parties herein, however, conceded during the oral argument in this proceeding that the letters of administration in dispute had been revoked by a subsequent order of the Surrogate’s Court. Accordingly, the instant appeal is academic. Kunzeman, J. P., Eiber, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.2d 486, 526 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-derosa-nyappdiv-1988.