In re the Estate of Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Davis

16 A.D.2d 683, 227 N.Y.S.2d 894

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 23, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 683 (In re the Estate of Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Davis, 16 A.D.2d 683, 227 N.Y.S.2d 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding for the judicial settlement of the final account of the executor, and for other relief, Giovanni Antonelli, an objectant to said account, appeals from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, made and entered August 24,1961 upon the decision of the Surrogate after a nonjury trial or hearing, which dismissed objeetant’s amended objection to the account and his amended claim against the decedent’s estate. The objection and the claim were based upon a judgment obtained by objectant in 1957 in a court in the Republic of Italy against decedent who had died in 1941. Decree affirmed, without costs, on the decision and opinion of the learned Surrogate (31 Misc 2d 270). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding for the judicial settlement of the final account of the executor, and for other relief, Giovanni Antonelli, an objectant to said account, appeals from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, made and entered August 24,1961 upon the decision of the Surrogate after a nonjury trial or hearing, which dismissed objeetant’s amended objection to the account and his amended claim against the decedent’s estate. The objection and the claim were based upon a judgment obtained by objectant in 1957 in a court in the Republic of Italy against decedent who had died in 1941. Decree affirmed, without costs, on the decision and opinion of the learned Surrogate (31 Misc 2d 270). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 683, 227 N.Y.S.2d 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-davis-nyappdiv-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack