In re the Estate of Dammann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Dammann

16 A.D.2d 953, 230 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9136

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 953 (In re the Estate of Dammann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Dammann, 16 A.D.2d 953, 230 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding for a judicial settlement of an account of proceedings and for a construction of paragraph “ Nineteenth ” of testator’s will, the executor and seven surviving residuary legatees appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, dated December 20, 1961, as adjudged said paragraph to mean that the share of the residuary estate left to a deceased residuary legatee, Charles A. K. Ensenbach, “ be distributed as in intestacy to Heinrich Dammann, the distributee entitled to inherit the same”. Decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding for a judicial settlement of an account of proceedings and for a construction of paragraph “ Nineteenth ” of testator’s will, the executor and seven surviving residuary legatees appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, dated December 20, 1961, as adjudged said paragraph to mean that the share of the residuary estate left to a deceased residuary legatee, Charles A. K. Ensenbach, “ be distributed as in intestacy to Heinrich Dammann, the distributee entitled to inherit the same”. Decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 953, 230 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-dammann-nyappdiv-1962.