In re the Estate of Crichton

26 A.D.2d 639, 272 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3677
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding to Settle an éxécutrix’ account, in Which tihe the parties made á motion tó substitute attOrñéys, Sidhfey S. BOtitié (the original attorney) appeals, as limited by his briefs, from so miieh o'f an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, entered April 5, 1966, granting such motion, as failed to fix th§ ¿mount of his fee, and instead,- inter alia, provided for its future deteffhiiiatiOn. Order insdfaí as_ áppéaíéd from, affirmed, With $Í0 costs and disb'tirs8ffiéntS payable by appellant personally to thé respondent, without prejudice to appeliárit’s remedy, if any, ufadér Séetitin 231-a Of the Surrogate's Court Act. No opinion. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Crichton, 26 A.D.2d 639, 272 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3677 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

26 A.D.2d 639 (In re the Estate of Crichton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crichton v. Succession of Crichton
232 So. 2d 109 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)