In re the Estate of Covert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Covert

231 A.D. 863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D. 863 (In re the Estate of Covert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Covert, 231 A.D. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county granting respondents, appellants, Eastman & Eastman an allowance of $1,250 and denying application of respondent, appellant, Gumbes for an allowance affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to Eastman & Eastman, payable out of the estate. Respondent, appellant, Gumbes rendered no valuable service to the estate and was not an attorney for a representative of the estate or of one who was interested therein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county granting respondents, appellants, Eastman & Eastman an allowance of $1,250 and denying application of respondent, appellant, Gumbes for an allowance affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to Eastman & Eastman, payable out of the estate. Respondent, appellant, Gumbes rendered no valuable service to the estate and was not an attorney for a representative of the estate or of one who was interested therein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-covert-nyappdiv-1930.