In re the Estate of Conlon
191 A.D. 913
Opinion
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Richmond county reversed, on the ground that the ruling of the court in excluding the testimony of the witness James R. Campbell was erroneous (Duryea v. Knapp, 174 App. Div. 131; Whitman v. Foley, 125 N. Y. 651, 659; Matter of McMillan, 218 id. 64, 68; Hungerford v. Snow, 129 App. Div. 816), and matter, remitted to said court for action, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Blaekmar, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Estate of Conlon, 191 A.D. 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
191 A.D. 913 (In re the Estate of Conlon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitman v. . Foley
26 N.E. 725 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)
Hungerford v. Snow
129 A.D. 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Duryea v. Knapp
174 A.D. 131 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)