In re the Estate of Conlon
This text of 191 A.D. 913 (In re the Estate of Conlon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Richmond county reversed, on the ground that the ruling of the court in excluding the testimony of the witness James R. Campbell was erroneous (Duryea v. Knapp, 174 App. Div. 131; Whitman v. Foley, 125 N. Y. 651, 659; Matter of McMillan, 218 id. 64, 68; Hungerford v. Snow, 129 App. Div. 816), and matter, remitted to said court for action, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Blaekmar, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 A.D. 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-conlon-nyappdiv-1920.