In re the Estate of Cohn

169 Misc. 351, 7 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2096
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided November 16, 1938·Published

Opinion

Hetherington, S.

The city of New York has filed a claim for unpaid sales tax. The administrators reject it. The claimant files objections to the account and asks that the claim be allowed. The administrators demand a hearing and determination of the amount due. The claimant objects on the ground that the surrogate has no jurisdiction to determine the amount of the tax, that the matter of adjustment or fixing the amount of such tax is exclusively in the Comptroller to whom the matter should be remitted. This seems to be the import of the statute. It is a tax levied by a designated authority from whose determination review may be had in a proper tribunal. The surrogate can only be governed by the amount of the tax as fixed by the Comptroller. However, since the claimant is willing that application for adjustment may be made to the Comptroller, the matter will be remitted to him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Cohn, 169 Misc. 351, 7 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2096 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1938).

169 Misc. 351 (In re the Estate of Cohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.