In re the Estate of Clare

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Clare

292 A.D.2d 605, 739 N.Y.S.2d 624, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 292 A.D.2d 605 (In re the Estate of Clare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Clare, 292 A.D.2d 605, 739 N.Y.S.2d 624, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In a probate proceeding, Michael Morgantini appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Feinberg, S.), dated December 22, 2000, which, inter alia, awarded payments to the Kings County Public Administrator, Joseph G. Clare, Walter F. Clare, and Thomas J. Clare net of certain taxes.

Ordered that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the appellant personally.

We agree with the Surrogate that the payments to the respondents Kings County Public Administrator, Joseph G. Clare, Walter F. Clare, and Thomas J. Clare, by reason of the settlement of their claims, are to be made net of certain taxes.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., O’Brien, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a probate proceeding, Michael Morgantini appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Feinberg, S.), dated December 22, 2000, which, inter alia, awarded payments to the Kings County Public Administrator, Joseph G. Clare, Walter F. Clare, and Thomas J. Clare net of certain taxes.

Ordered that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the appellant personally.

We agree with the Surrogate that the payments to the respondents Kings County Public Administrator, Joseph G. Clare, Walter F. Clare, and Thomas J. Clare, by reason of the settlement of their claims, are to be made net of certain taxes.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., O’Brien, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 A.D.2d 605, 739 N.Y.S.2d 624, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-clare-nyappdiv-2002.