In Re the Estate of Churik
397 A.2d 655, 78 N.J. 563, 1979 N.J. LEXIS 1164
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, and Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford, Schreiber and Handler — 7.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Estate of Churik, 397 A.2d 655, 78 N.J. 563, 1979 N.J. LEXIS 1164 (N.J. 1979).
397 A.2d 655 (In Re the Estate of Churik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Catelli v. Villone
825 A.2d 1209 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
Paul v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.
523 A.2d 663 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Haynes v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJ
432 A.2d 890 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1981)