In re the Estate of Chirico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Chirico

174 A.D.2d 566, 572 N.Y.S.2d 644, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8768

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 1991·Published

Opinion

—In an accounting proceeding, Rita Eredics, the attorney for the co-executors of the estate of Frank A. Chirico, deceased, appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Laurino, S.), dated November 27, 1989, as, without a hearing, disallowed, in part, her claims for certain legal fees.

Ordered that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Verplanck, 151 AD2d 767; Matter of Von Hofe, 145 AD2d 424). Bracken, J. P., Hooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an accounting proceeding, Rita Eredics, the attorney for the co-executors of the estate of Frank A. Chirico, deceased, appeals from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Laurino, S.), dated November 27, 1989, as, without a hearing, disallowed, in part, her claims for certain legal fees.

Ordered that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Verplanck, 151 AD2d 767; Matter of Von Hofe, 145 AD2d 424). Bracken, J. P., Hooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

In re the Estate of Chirico, 174 A.D.2d 566, 572 N.Y.S.2d 644, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

174 A.D.2d 566 (In re the Estate of Chirico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related