In re the Estate of Carmichael

259 A.D. 970, 19 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7472

This text of 259 A.D. 970 (In re the Estate of Carmichael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Carmichael, 259 A.D. 970, 19 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7472 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Decree affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate. Memorandum: From the fact that Waddell Carmichael married the mother of petitioner before petitioner was bom a presumption arises that he was the father of petitioner (Matter of Lentz, 247 App. Div. 31, 34); but beyond that the record amply supports the finding that he was in fact the petitioner’s father, and that petitioner is the only heir of decedent. All concur. (The decree adjudges petitioner to be the sole heir and next of kin and distributee of decedent, in a proceeding to establish inheritance rights.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Lentz
247 A.D. 31 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 970, 19 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-carmichael-nyappdiv-1940.