In re the Estate of Cammareri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Cammareri

34 A.D.3d 800, 823 N.Y.S.2d 916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 28, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.3d 800 (In re the Estate of Cammareri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Cammareri, 34 A.D.3d 800, 823 N.Y.S.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In a contested probate proceeding, Sylvia Suncin and Sylvia Cammareri appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s [801]*801Court, Richmond County (Fusco, S.), dated March 29, 2005, which denied the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing objections to the decedent’s will dated January 21, 1991, and to admit the will to probate.

Ordered that the appeal by Sylvia Cammareri is dismissed, as she is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the petitioner personally.

On the record presented, there are triable issues of fact as to whether the will at issue was duly executed (see Matter of Jacinto, 172 AD2d 664 [1991]; EPTL 3-2.1; SCPA 1408). Thus, the Surrogate’s Court properly denied the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the objections to the will and to admit the will to probate. Crane, J.P, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a contested probate proceeding, Sylvia Suncin and Sylvia Cammareri appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s [801]*801Court, Richmond County (Fusco, S.), dated March 29, 2005, which denied the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing objections to the decedent’s will dated January 21, 1991, and to admit the will to probate.

Ordered that the appeal by Sylvia Cammareri is dismissed, as she is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the petitioner personally.

On the record presented, there are triable issues of fact as to whether the will at issue was duly executed (see Matter of Jacinto, 172 AD2d 664 [1991]; EPTL 3-2.1; SCPA 1408). Thus, the Surrogate’s Court properly denied the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the objections to the will and to admit the will to probate. Crane, J.P, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.3d 800, 823 N.Y.S.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-cammareri-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack