In re the Estate of Butterworth

158 Misc. 480, 286 N.Y.S. 112, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 993
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided February 20, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Delehanty, S.

Since publication of the decision of the court in this accounting (158 Misc. 477), the attorney for the estate who was also the attorney for deceased has filed an affidavit that he alone is responsible for the form of the account and that it was sent to the corporate fiduciary only for check of receipts and payments and balance on hand. He states that the corporate fiduciary relied wholly upon him in connection with the preparation of the account and that the corporate fiduciary is not chargeable with any affirmative act in relation either to the form of the account or to the computation of commissions. Record is made of this exculpation of the corporate fiduciary. A revised computation of commissions has been submitted and the decree has been signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Butterworth, 158 Misc. 480, 286 N.Y.S. 112, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 993 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1936).

158 Misc. 480 (In re the Estate of Butterworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Henning v. Commissioner
68 T.C. 374 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)