In re the Estate of Brush
This text of 163 A.D. 942 (In re the Estate of Brush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the application denied upon the ground that the moving petition fails to disclose sufficient reasons for the compromise of the claim against Lillie M. Taylor at the amount stated, without prejudice to a renewal of the application upon showing sufficient facts. Present — Ingraham, ■ P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and [943]*943Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and application denied without prejudice to a renewal as stated in opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 A.D. 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-brush-nyappdiv-1914.