In re the Estate of Brewer

Missouri Court of Appeals

In re the Estate of Brewer

400 S.W.3d 494, 2013 WL 1803933, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 516

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 30, 2013

DocketNo. ED 98657

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 400 S.W.3d 494 (In re the Estate of Brewer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Brewer, 400 S.W.3d 494, 2013 WL 1803933, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 516 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Brewer (“Claimant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court which granted partial summary judgment in favor of the Estate of Letha Mildred Brewer (“the Estate of Decedent”) as well as the Estate of Decedent’s motion for directed verdict. Claimant contends the trial court erred in: (1) finding all claims for agreements entered into, or obligations incurred, and accruing five years or more prior to the filing of Claimant’s original claim are barred by the statute of limitations; (2) finding the facts presented by Claimant did not establish an agreement that overcame the presumption of gratuitous services; and (3) granting partial summary judgment on Claimant’s quantum meruit claim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Brewer (“Claimant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court which granted partial summary judgment in favor of the Estate of Letha Mildred Brewer (“the Estate of Decedent”) as well as the Estate of Decedent’s motion for directed verdict. Claimant contends the trial court erred in: (1) finding all claims for agreements entered into, or obligations incurred, and accruing five years or more prior to the filing of Claimant’s original claim are barred by the statute of limitations; (2) finding the facts presented by Claimant did not establish an agreement that overcame the presumption of gratuitous services; and (3) granting partial summary judgment on Claimant’s quantum meruit claim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

400 S.W.3d 494, 2013 WL 1803933, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-brewer-moctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack