In re the Estate of Brayton

18 A.D.2d 753, 234 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6584

This text of 18 A.D.2d 753 (In re the Estate of Brayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Brayton, 18 A.D.2d 753, 234 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinions

Memorandum by the Court.

Upon the facts here presented it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the Surrogate to grant letters of administration with the will annexed to the committee of the life beneficiary. Such action placed one of the committee (Mildred E. Merriman) in a dual position that may result in serious conflict. Mrs. Merriman’s husband, Warren C. Merriman, and thp life beneficiary were executors of the will from 1935 to June 19, 1950 when the latter was removed by reason of her incompetency. There was no accounting, however, by Merriman and the committee of his coexecutor for the period from 1938 to 1950. In addition there was no accounting by Merriman from 1950 to the time of his death in 1960. Neither has Mrs. Merriman, as executor of her husband’s will accounted for his activities from 1938 to the present. Upon the hearing herein proof was offered that in 1938 Merriman, as executor, assigned certain mortgages owned by the estate to a third party and the following day the latter reassigned the mortgages to Merriman as an individual. Under the will the presently incompetent life beneficiary was given the right to invade the corpus of the estate. If need therefor arises and the right now exists it may be pursued by the committee. We conclude that the best interests of the estate and the exercise of a proper discretion require that letters testamentary with the will annexed issue to appellant, Abby L. Brayton Ruediger, and Herkimer County Trust Company, one of the committee of Jennie A. Brayton, the incompetent life beneficiary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Proving the Will of Leland
114 N.E. 854 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
In Re Proving the Will of Flood
140 N.E. 936 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Latham
145 A.D. 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
In re the Probate of the Will of Foss
282 A.D. 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
In re the Administration on the Estate of McOwen
114 Misc. 151 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1921)
In re the Probate of the Will of Puglisi
205 Misc. 773 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1954)
In re the Estate of Folsom
3 Misc. 2d 75 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1955)
In re the Probate of the Will of Hoppin
3 Misc. 2d 315 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1956)
In re the Estate of Kent
22 Misc. 2d 66 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A.D.2d 753, 234 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-brayton-nyappdiv-1962.