In re the Estate of Braloff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Braloff

285 A.D. 977, 139 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6352

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D. 977 (In re the Estate of Braloff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Braloff, 285 A.D. 977, 139 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Application by two executors to restrain their coexecutor from unilaterally taking any action as executor, on behalf of the estate or otherwise, including but not limited to the filing of any Federal estate tax return. The will provides that a majority vote of the executors control as to all matters. The application was denied without prejudice to renew if other action is taken unilaterally contrary to the terms of the will, on the grounds that the court was without power to enjoin respondent from filing a Federal estate tax return and that the provisions of the will do not prevent respondent from filing such return. Order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. MacCrate, Acting P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by two executors to restrain their coexecutor from unilaterally taking any action as executor, on behalf of the estate or otherwise, including but not limited to the filing of any Federal estate tax return. The will provides that a majority vote of the executors control as to all matters. The application was denied without prejudice to renew if other action is taken unilaterally contrary to the terms of the will, on the grounds that the court was without power to enjoin respondent from filing a Federal estate tax return and that the provisions of the will do not prevent respondent from filing such return. Order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. MacCrate, Acting P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 977, 139 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-braloff-nyappdiv-1955.