In re the Estate of Brahaney

103 A.D.2d 1002, 478 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19680
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 13, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 103 A.D.2d 1002 (In re the Estate of Brahaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Brahaney, 103 A.D.2d 1002, 478 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

— Decree unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Surrogate (Horey, S.). We add only that, considering the will in its entirety, the testator intended by the words “or the survivor or survivors of them” that the ultimate beneficiary or beneficiaries survive the other named beneficiaries. Where the testator made bequests dependent upon survivorship of himself, he clearly so stated. (Appeal from decree of Cattaraugus County Surrogate’s Court, Horey, S. — will construction.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Green and O’Donnell, JJ. [117 Misc 2d 46.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Sprinchorn
151 A.D.2d 27 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re Marine Midland Bank, N. A.
127 A.D.2d 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.2d 1002, 478 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-brahaney-nyappdiv-1984.