In re the Estate of Bodenstein

257 A.D. 901, 12 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8330
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 3, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 257 A.D. 901 (In re the Estate of Bodenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Bodenstein, 257 A.D. 901, 12 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Decree affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate. Memorandum: In a proceeding to determine the validity of a claim on behalf of a widow, who had been adjudged incompetent, to take her intestate share of her husband’s estate, against his will, pursuant to section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law, we conclude that, upon the undisputed facts and in accord with section 18, subdivision 1, paragraph (b), and subdivision 6, her committee became entitled to a limited right of election on her behalf, to withdraw the sum of $2,500 absolutely from the principal of a testamentary trust created in her favor, the amount of which was equal to or greater than her intestate share. (Matter of Rich, 149 Misc. 843, 844-845; affd., 242 App. Div. 613.) Mindful that it was the Legislature’s declared intention, when section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law was adopted, “ * * * to increase the share of a surviving spouse in the estate of a deceased spouse * * * ” and giving heed to the admonition that the statute “ shall be liberally construed to carry out such intention ” (Laws of 1929, chap. 229, § 20) we cannot accept appellants’ argument [902]*902that section 18 must be so construed as to require the widow to exhaust the $2,500, which is to be deducted from the principal of the testamentary trust, before any withdrawals from income or the balance of principal are made for her care and maintenance. (See Matter of Byrnes, 260 N. Y. 465, 470-472.) All concur. (The decree determines decedent’s widow has a limited right of election contrary to the terms of a will.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Construction of the Will of Atkins
193 Misc. 273 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1948)
In re the Estate of De Pinna
178 Misc. 21 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)
In re the Estate of Higgins Stott
178 Misc. 338 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D. 901, 12 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-bodenstein-nyappdiv-1939.