In re the Estate of Bobula
This text of 227 N.E.2d 49 (In re the Estate of Bobula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order reversed, with costs to abide the event, and matter remanded to the Surrogate’s Court, Brie County, to determine whether the killing herein occurred under circumstances which would exculpate the killer from criminal liability, e.g., if he were insane. If it be determined that he was legally insane and there could have been no successful prosecution of John Bobula had he lived, then the property should be distributed as originally provided for by the Surrogate.
Concur: Judges Van Voorhis, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating. Judge Burke dissents and votes to affirm in the following opinion in which Chief Judge Fulo and Judge Breitel concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 N.E.2d 49, 19 N.Y.2d 818, 280 N.Y.S.2d 152, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-bobula-ny-1967.