In re the Estate of Billy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Billy

7 A.D.2d 614, 178 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4578

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 614 (In re the Estate of Billy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Billy, 7 A.D.2d 614, 178 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4578 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree reversed on the law and facts and petition in Cattaraugus County dismissed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: The Surrogate has found that the infant at the time of her death was domiciled in Cattaraugus County. There was no evidence upon which to base such a finding. The parents had separated in 1947 and the mother established a separate domicile with the two children in Niagara County. Thereupon the domicile of the decedent became that of the mother. (Matter of Thorne, 240 N. Y. 444, 449; People ex rel. Halvey v. Halvey, 185 Misc. 52, 54, affd. 269 App. Div. 1019, affd. 295 N. Y. 836; Restatement, Conflict of Laws, § 32.) In December, 1956 the Children’s Court of Niagara County placed the decedent in 'the custody of the Commissioner of Public Welfare of that county and she was committed to an institutional home in Buffalo. The mother paid $15 weekly for her support therein pursuant to the same order. In August, 1957 the decedent ran away from the institution and sojourned with her father in Cattaraugus County from August 14 to about August 30, 1957. The decedent was killed in an automobile accident in Niagara County on September 13, 1957. Implicit in the decision of the Surrogate is a finding that the decedent could choose her residence or domicile. This an infant may not do. (Cf. Matter of Thorne, supra, p. 450.) The decedent at the time of her death was a resident of Niagara County and the Surrogate of Cattaraugus County was without jurisdiction. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 45.) All concur. (Appeal from a decree of Cattaraugus Surrogate’s Coui’t granting limited letters of administration to petitioner.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree reversed on the law and facts and petition in Cattaraugus County dismissed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: The Surrogate has found that the infant at the time of her death was domiciled in Cattaraugus County. There was no evidence upon which to base such a finding. The parents had separated in 1947 and the mother established a separate domicile with the two children in Niagara County. Thereupon the domicile of the decedent became that of the mother. (Matter of Thorne, 240 N. Y. 444, 449; People ex rel. Halvey v. Halvey, 185 Misc. 52, 54, affd. 269 App. Div. 1019, affd. 295 N. Y. 836; Restatement, Conflict of Laws, § 32.) In December, 1956 the Children’s Court of Niagara County placed the decedent in 'the custody of the Commissioner of Public Welfare of that county and she was committed to an institutional home in Buffalo. The mother paid $15 weekly for her support therein pursuant to the same order. In August, 1957 the decedent ran away from the institution and sojourned with her father in Cattaraugus County from August 14 to about August 30, 1957. The decedent was killed in an automobile accident in Niagara County on September 13, 1957. Implicit in the decision of the Surrogate is a finding that the decedent could choose her residence or domicile. This an infant may not do. (Cf. Matter of Thorne, supra, p. 450.) The decedent at the time of her death was a resident of Niagara County and the Surrogate of Cattaraugus County was without jurisdiction. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 45.) All concur. (Appeal from a decree of Cattaraugus Surrogate’s Coui’t granting limited letters of administration to petitioner.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 614, 178 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-billy-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack