Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re the Estate of Betlem

In re the Estate of Betlem

19 A.D.3d 1066, 796 N.Y.S.2d 296
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 10, 2005
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.3d 1066 (In re the Estate of Betlem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Betlem, 19 A.D.3d 1066, 796 N.Y.S.2d 296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Monroe County (Edmund A. Calvaruso, S.), entered October 23, 2003. The order denied respondent’s motion to compel the deposition of petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same héreby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nusshaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.D.3d 1066, 796 N.Y.S.2d 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-betlem-nyappdiv-2005.