In re the Estate of Belknap

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Belknap

16 A.D.2d 683, 227 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10179

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 23, 1962

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 A.D.2d 683 (In re the Estate of Belknap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Belknap, 16 A.D.2d 683, 227 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding for the settlement of the final account of the surviving trustee and of the executors of a deceased trustee under the trust created by Article Fourth of the will of Waldron P. Belknap, deceased, and for the judicial construction of such article, the surviving remaindermen of said trust appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County, dated October 10, 1961, as construed said article and as directed distribution of a one-fourth share of the trust remainder to the estate of Maitland Belknap, a nonsurviving remainderman. Decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding for the settlement of the final account of the surviving trustee and of the executors of a deceased trustee under the trust created by Article Fourth of the will of Waldron P. Belknap, deceased, and for the judicial construction of such article, the surviving remaindermen of said trust appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County, dated October 10, 1961, as construed said article and as directed distribution of a one-fourth share of the trust remainder to the estate of Maitland Belknap, a nonsurviving remainderman. Decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 683, 227 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-belknap-nyappdiv-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack