In re the Estate of Beach

9 A.D.2d 636, 191 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7118
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal, as renewed upon argument of the appeal, granted with $10 motion costs, and appeal dismissed on the ground that the appellant, having been in default, may not appeal. Appeal dismissed, without costs upon motion. Memorandum: We treat the appeal as one from the decree of judicial settlement and find that the appellant was in default. If we were to reach the question, which does not appear to be presented, as to whether or not the order of October 2, 1958, denying the objection to jurisdiction, was properly made, we would affirm the order. The order must be specified in the notice of appeal under section 295 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. All concur. (Appeal from a decree of Oneida Surrogate’s Court settling the accounts of the estate of decedent and directing distribution.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Beach, 9 A.D.2d 636, 191 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

9 A.D.2d 636 (In re the Estate of Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beach v. Oneida National Bank & Trust Co.
206 F. Supp. 508 (N.D. New York, 1961)