In re the Estate of Balazs

147 Misc. 95, 264 N.Y.S. 346, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1146
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedMarch 24, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 147 Misc. 95 (In re the Estate of Balazs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Balazs, 147 Misc. 95, 264 N.Y.S. 346, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1146 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1933).

Opinion

Delehanty, S.

The court finds that the attorney for the administrator c. t. a. has received a total of $970.73. Included in this amount is the sum of $150 allowed by order of the court on the proceeding to construe the will. The payments to the attorney were made upon the basis of a letter signed by him in which he agreed that his charges would be subject to the approval of the Surrogate’s Court. Included in the account is a charge of $125.78 for disbursements. In this sum are included three items of $10 each paid to the wife of the attorney for service of papers. Other items of disbursements are not satisfactorily shown. The court determines that for general services to the estate the sum of $425 is adequate. The court determines that the disbursements of the [96]*96attorney did not exceed $100 and that amount only is allowed. Adding to these sums the $150 heretofore allowed by order of the court there is reached a total of $675 to cover the services and disbursements. Since the total paid to the attorney is $970.73, there is due as a refund $295.73. The attorney attended upon the hearing and was fully heard upon the matter of his fees. The court has full power to determine his compensation. (Matter of Dollar, 103 Misc. 137; affd. sub nom. Matter of Hulett, 231 N. Y. 545.) The decree to be entered will provide for the refund of the sum of $295.73 by the attorney within thirty days from the date of entry.

Submit decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Netter v. Willsey
53 A.D.2d 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Estate of Liell
148 Misc. 279 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)
In re the Estate of Cromwell
148 Misc. 343 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 Misc. 95, 264 N.Y.S. 346, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-balazs-nysurct-1933.