In re the Estate Arns

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Estate Arns

144 Misc. 584, 259 N.Y.S. 69, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1196

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedMay 12, 1932

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 Misc. 584 (In re the Estate Arns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate Arns, 144 Misc. 584, 259 N.Y.S. 69, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1196 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

O’Brien, S.

This is an application for a construction of the will of the testatrix as to whether or not a power of sale conferred upon the executors by the eighth paragraph thereof is an imperative power of sale or simply discretionary. This paragraph of the will reads as follows:

“ Eighth. I nominate, constitute and appoint my son, Charles William Arns and Adam Wiener, Counsellor-at-law, executors of this my last will and testament, giving them full and absolute powers as such, including the power to sell, lease, mortgage, or otherwise dispose of any or all of my estate, as they see fit.”

At the time of the death of the testatrix she owned two parcels of real property located in 5 the city of New York. These two parcels of property are included in the residue of her estate which was devised one-fourth to Charles W. Arns, one-fourth to Arthur Arns, one-fourth to Josephine Arns and the remaining one-fourth in trust for the benefit of Louis R. Arns. As the real property is not susceptible of physical division into four parts in order to effectuate the devises to the testatrix’s four children the only way in which the testamentary scheme can be carried out is by a sale of said real estate. The testatrix realizing this possibility inserted the eighth paragraph in her will which contains a power of sale and I hold that said power of sale is mandatory. By the use of the words “ as they see fit ” the executors are vested with a discretion as to the time of the sale. (Haight v. Brisbin, 96 N. Y. 132; Lent v. Howard, 89 id. 169; Salisbury v. Slade, 160 id. 278.) Submit decree on notice construing the will accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’Brien, S.

This is an application for a construction of the will of the testatrix as to whether or not a power of sale conferred upon the executors by the eighth paragraph thereof is an imperative power of sale or simply discretionary. This paragraph of the will reads as follows:

“ Eighth. I nominate, constitute and appoint my son, Charles William Arns and Adam Wiener, Counsellor-at-law, executors of this my last will and testament, giving them full and absolute powers as such, including the power to sell, lease, mortgage, or otherwise dispose of any or all of my estate, as they see fit.”

At the time of the death of the testatrix she owned two parcels of real property located in 5 the city of New York. These two parcels of property are included in the residue of her estate which was devised one-fourth to Charles W. Arns, one-fourth to Arthur Arns, one-fourth to Josephine Arns and the remaining one-fourth in trust for the benefit of Louis R. Arns. As the real property is not susceptible of physical division into four parts in order to effectuate the devises to the testatrix’s four children the only way in which the testamentary scheme can be carried out is by a sale of said real estate. The testatrix realizing this possibility inserted the eighth paragraph in her will which contains a power of sale and I hold that said power of sale is mandatory. By the use of the words “ as they see fit ” the executors are vested with a discretion as to the time of the sale. (Haight v. Brisbin, 96 N. Y. 132; Lent v. Howard, 89 id. 169; Salisbury v. Slade, 160 id. 278.) Submit decree on notice construing the will accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 Misc. 584, 259 N.Y.S. 69, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-arns-nysurct-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack