In re the Election of Directors of The Rapid Transit Ferry Co.

19 Misc. 409, 43 N.Y.S. 538
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gaynor, J.

By general law, the stockholders present in person or by proxy at a meeting of stockholders constitute a quorum. The General Corporation Law, however, allows the directors to change this by by-law, and fix the amount of stock which must be represented in order to make a quorum. § 11, " In this company the following by-law was passed, viz.:' “A majority of the stock present in person or by proxy at any meeting of the stockholders shall constitute a quorum.” It is without any punctuation marks. Unless to establish á quorum different to that which the general law makes, this by-law could, have had no object. It cannot be construed as meaning that a majority ” of the stock actually represented at a meeting should be a quorum, for that would be unlawful. A majority, cannot separate itself from the minority, and be a quorum. All present are the quorum. It must therefore mean that it is necessary that a majority of the stock of the-company shall be present in person or by proxy to make a quorum. I must therefore set aside the election of 1896.' That of 1895 has been acquiesced in. I think that the statute contemplates that an application to set aside an election of direet[410]*410ors must be made with reasonable promptness, and that if, in-' stead, the election is acquiesced in, stockholders so acquiescing Jose the benefit of the statute.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Election of Directors of The Rapid Transit Ferry Co., 19 Misc. 409, 43 N.Y.S. 538 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

19 Misc. 409 (In re the Election of Directors of The Rapid Transit Ferry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Town
138 N.W. 334 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)