In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Kesterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Kesterson

569 P.2d 42, 30 Or. App. 963, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1757

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 12, 1977

DocketNo. 76-2862-E-2, CA 7948

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 569 P.2d 42 (In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Kesterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Kesterson, 569 P.2d 42, 30 Or. App. 963, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1757 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue in this dissolution-of-marriage proceedings is who should have custody of two of the parties’ three children. The judge awarded custody of all three of the children, aged 8 through 14, to the mother. The father contends he should have custody of the two younger children. The trial judge made it clear in his oral opinion that he thought there was not much to say for either of the parents, that the advantages and disadvantages of each were roughly comparable, and that keeping the three children together was the deciding factor in awarding custody to the mother. We agree. Starin and Starin, 29 Or App 557, 564 P2d 748, Sup Ct review denied (1977); Sarty v. Forney, 12 Or App 25, 506 P2d 535 (1973).

Affirmed. No costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue in this dissolution-of-marriage proceedings is who should have custody of two of the parties’ three children. The judge awarded custody of all three of the children, aged 8 through 14, to the mother. The father contends he should have custody of the two younger children. The trial judge made it clear in his oral opinion that he thought there was not much to say for either of the parents, that the advantages and disadvantages of each were roughly comparable, and that keeping the three children together was the deciding factor in awarding custody to the mother. We agree. Starin and Starin, 29 Or App 557, 564 P2d 748, Sup Ct review denied (1977); Sarty v. Forney, 12 Or App 25, 506 P2d 535 (1973).

Affirmed. No costs to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

569 P.2d 42, 30 Or. App. 963, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-dissolution-of-the-marriage-of-kesterson-orctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack