In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Durig

Court of Appeals of Oregon

In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Durig

559 P.2d 532, 28 Or. App. 353, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2630

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 31, 1977

DocketNo. 419-616, CA 6506

StatusPublished

This text of 559 P.2d 532 (In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Durig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Durig, 559 P.2d 532, 28 Or. App. 353, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2630 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The husband appeals from the decree of dissolution, challenging both the award of $25 per month support to the wife and the property division. Since the division of property awards the husband at least as much, if not more, than the written proposal submitted by him to the court following the receipt of all the evidence, it is difficult to understand the basis for his present objections.

From our examination of the lengthy record we conclude that the long experienced trial judge did indeed make a just and equitable division of the property.

Likewise, we agree that an award of $25 a month permanent support to his wife of 26 years, who has the custody of the minor child and earns a take-home pay of $340 a month, is most reasonable indeed.

Affirmed. Costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The husband appeals from the decree of dissolution, challenging both the award of $25 per month support to the wife and the property division. Since the division of property awards the husband at least as much, if not more, than the written proposal submitted by him to the court following the receipt of all the evidence, it is difficult to understand the basis for his present objections.

From our examination of the lengthy record we conclude that the long experienced trial judge did indeed make a just and equitable division of the property.

Likewise, we agree that an award of $25 a month permanent support to his wife of 26 years, who has the custody of the minor child and earns a take-home pay of $340 a month, is most reasonable indeed.

Affirmed. Costs to respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 P.2d 532, 28 Or. App. 353, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-dissolution-of-the-marriage-of-durig-orctapp-1977.