In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Dunn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Dunn

569 P.2d 43, 30 Or. App. 967, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1758

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 12, 1977

DocketNo. CC76-47, CA 7745

StatusPublished

This text of 569 P.2d 43 (In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Dunn, 569 P.2d 43, 30 Or. App. 967, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1758 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this dissolution-of-marriage proceeding the husband appeals, contending that the decree gave the wife a disproportionate share of the family assets. The parties were married for some 40 years. The husband worked until retirement; the wife, now aged 65, worked for the last 20 years of the marriage and is still working. Accepting the husband’s figures, roughly $170,000 worth of property was accumulated by the parties during the 40-year marriage, and the judge divided it about equally, with the "long half” going to the husband. There was no award of support. The husband, who is retired, has an adequate retirement income; the wife will soon have an adequate retirement income albeit not as substantial as the husband’s. We see no basis for changing the decree of the trial court.

Affirmed. Costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this dissolution-of-marriage proceeding the husband appeals, contending that the decree gave the wife a disproportionate share of the family assets. The parties were married for some 40 years. The husband worked until retirement; the wife, now aged 65, worked for the last 20 years of the marriage and is still working. Accepting the husband’s figures, roughly $170,000 worth of property was accumulated by the parties during the 40-year marriage, and the judge divided it about equally, with the "long half” going to the husband. There was no award of support. The husband, who is retired, has an adequate retirement income; the wife will soon have an adequate retirement income albeit not as substantial as the husband’s. We see no basis for changing the decree of the trial court.

Affirmed. Costs to respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

569 P.2d 43, 30 Or. App. 967, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-dissolution-of-the-marriage-of-dunn-orctapp-1977.