In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Chance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Chance

510 P.2d 1351, 13 Or. App. 620, 1973 Ore. App. LEXIS 1224

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 18, 1973·No. No. 71 4095·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the present dissolution proceeding of a 26-[621]*621year marriage between parties 57 and 56, respectively, the sole issues are the division of property and the award of alimony.

The trial court awarded real property of a net value of approximately $30,000 to the husband but required that he pay $10,500 forthwith to the wife. Thus it could be said that he received approximately $19,500 as against her $10,500 as a result of this property division.

While the award of property was somewhat favorable to the husband, alimony of $100 per month was awarded to the wife, continuing until she “is 65 years of age and retires, the remarriage of * * * [the wife], or until the death of either * *

We review de novo. Newman v. Newman, 8 Or App 220, 493 P2d 71, Sup Ct review denied (1972); Emery v. Emery, 5 Or App 133, 481 P2d 656, Sup Ct review denied (1971). From our review we find no reason to change the decree in any way.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the present dissolution proceeding of a 26-[621]*621year marriage between parties 57 and 56, respectively, the sole issues are the division of property and the award of alimony.

The trial court awarded real property of a net value of approximately $30,000 to the husband but required that he pay $10,500 forthwith to the wife. Thus it could be said that he received approximately $19,500 as against her $10,500 as a result of this property division.

While the award of property was somewhat favorable to the husband, alimony of $100 per month was awarded to the wife, continuing until she “is 65 years of age and retires, the remarriage of * * * [the wife], or until the death of either * *

We review de novo. Newman v. Newman, 8 Or App 220, 493 P2d 71, Sup Ct review denied (1972); Emery v. Emery, 5 Or App 133, 481 P2d 656, Sup Ct review denied (1971). From our review we find no reason to change the decree in any way.

Affirmed.

In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Chance, 510 P.2d 1351, 13 Or. App. 620, 1973 Ore. App. LEXIS 1224 (Or. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

510 P.2d 1351 (In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Chance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related