In re the Discipline of Ray
This text of 275 N.W.2d 32 (In re the Discipline of Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the court on the petition of the Administrative Director on Professional Conduct for the discipline of Paul H. Ray and on the stipulation of the parties.
The court, having heard the statements of the parties, and it appearing that Mr. Ray is an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, that Mr. Ray has admitted violations of DR 1-. 102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6), DR 2-106(A), DR 6-101(A)(3), and DR 9-102(A) and (B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, and that. Mr. Ray was placed on supervised probation for one year by the order of this court of November 20, 1970, for violations of a similar nature;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Paul H. Ray is suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, and that on or after December 14, 1979, this court will consider his petition for reinstatement to practice upon application by Mr. Ray and demonstration by him that he could be so reinstated subject to such conditions or limitations that the public interest would be furthered and the possibility of prejudice to the public eliminated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 N.W.2d 32, 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-discipline-of-ray-minn-1979.