In re the Discipline of Oldenkamp
This text of 374 N.W.2d 280 (In re the Discipline of Oldenkamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR TEMPORARY SUSPENSION
WHEREAS, the above-entitled matter is before this court upon the application of the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility; and
WHEREAS, it appears to this court that the continued practice of law by respondent, Roger L. Oldenkamp, pending outcome of the disciplinary proceeding against him, does not pose a risk of injury to the [281]*281public as required for a temporary suspension under Minn.R.Law.Prof.Resp. 16; and
WHEREAS, it further appears to this court that a temporary suspension of the respondent is unnecessary when disciplinary proceedings have already been referred to a referee for findings;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the petition of the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility for the temporary suspension of Roger L. Oldenkamp from the practice of law in the State of Minnesota is hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 N.W.2d 280, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-discipline-of-oldenkamp-minn-1985.