In Re the Discipline of Nurnberger

272 N.W.2d 914, 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1222
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedDecember 15, 1978
Docket48931
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 272 N.W.2d 914 (In Re the Discipline of Nurnberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Discipline of Nurnberger, 272 N.W.2d 914, 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1222 (Mich. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding brought by the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board for the Discipline of an attorney at law admitted to practice in the State of Minnesota.

Respondent, who practiced as a debt collection attorney, maintained a law firm trust account. During the period from 1974 to 1977, primarily as a result of acute alcoholism, he converted large sums to his personal and business use. During these three years, his average annual volume in the trust account was $750,000. Initially, Respondent returned all withdrawn funds on a monthly basis, but during 1975 he accumulated an improper deficit of $35,000. Notwithstanding the improper withdrawals, Respondent promptly remitted all funds to clients, fully accounted to all clients for funds held on their behalf and, on September 1 and 2, 1977, disclosed to all affected clients his improper previous transfers of trust funds.

He thereafter voluntarily contacted the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board and candidly disclosed the improper transfers of funds upon which the petition for discipline is based.

In the instant case, unlike In re Application for Discipline of Stearns, 309 Minn. 548, 243 N.W.2d 312 (1976), Respondent has voluntarily undergone inpatient treatment for his alcoholism and continues with weekly outpatient sessions. Under the circumstances, it is the opinion of the court that the attorney be placed upon supervised probation for a period of five years, upon condition that he commit no further violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility, that he continue a program for treatment of alcoholism and abstain from the use of alcohol, and that he maintain all books and records of his office in a manner compliant with the applicable disciplinary rules, to be made immediately available upon request of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board.

Probation in accordance with this opinion ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Weiss
839 A.2d 670 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Olsen
487 N.W.2d 871 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1992)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Simonson
365 N.W.2d 259 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1985)
Matter of Discipline of Okerman
310 N.W.2d 568 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1981)
In Re the Disbarment of Wackerbarth
287 N.W.2d 651 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 N.W.2d 914, 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-discipline-of-nurnberger-minn-1978.