In Re the Discipline of Kimmel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In Re the Discipline of Kimmel

347 N.W.2d 52, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1334

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 18, 1984

DocketC1-81-955

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 347 N.W.2d 52 (In Re the Discipline of Kimmel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re the Discipline of Kimmel, 347 N.W.2d 52, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1334 (Mich. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, by decision of this court filed July 23, 1982, In re Kimmel, 322 N.W.2d 224 (Minn.1982), respondent’s practice has been restricted to examiner of titles throughout the remainder of his probation in connection with State of Minnesota v. Harold Dean Kimmel, Washington County, - # 4479, Pine County # 64-25B; and

WHEREAS, by order of the Washington County District Court dated April 2, 1984, respondent was discharged from probation; and

WHEREAS, respondent has satisfied all current Continuing Legal Education requirements and has paid all past and current attorney registration fees;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, consistent with the original opinion of this court and upon the respondent’s demonstrated satisfactory completion of the terms of the suspension from practice, respondent is reinstated to practice law. Minn.R.Law.Prof. Resp. 18 is deemed inapplicable to these proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI