In re the Disciplinary Action Against Klein

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re the Disciplinary Action Against Klein

464 N.W.2d 296, 1991 Minn. LEXIS 1, 1991 WL 1446

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 4, 1991

DocketNo. C5-88-1968

StatusPublished

This text of 464 N.W.2d 296 (In re the Disciplinary Action Against Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Disciplinary Action Against Klein, 464 N.W.2d 296, 1991 Minn. LEXIS 1, 1991 WL 1446 (Mich. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, the petitioner, Harlan P. Klein, was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law by order of this court dated July 14, 1989, and

WHEREAS, the petitioner has furnished this court with evidence of his partial compliance with the conditions of reinstatement stated in said order, and

WHEREAS, the petitioner has failed to comply with other conditions of reinstatement stated in said order, specifically, respondent has failed to pay in full the costs and disbursements taxed against him under Rule 24(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the petition of Harlan P. Klein for reinstatement to the practice of law hereby is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

WHEREAS, the petitioner, Harlan P. Klein, was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law by order of this court dated July 14, 1989, and

WHEREAS, the petitioner has furnished this court with evidence of his partial compliance with the conditions of reinstatement stated in said order, and

WHEREAS, the petitioner has failed to comply with other conditions of reinstatement stated in said order, specifically, respondent has failed to pay in full the costs and disbursements taxed against him under Rule 24(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the petition of Harlan P. Klein for reinstatement to the practice of law hereby is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

464 N.W.2d 296, 1991 Minn. LEXIS 1, 1991 WL 1446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-disciplinary-action-against-klein-minn-1991.