In Re the Disbarment of Hennings

283 N.W.2d 896, 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1646
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedAugust 3, 1979
Docket48975
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 283 N.W.2d 896 (In Re the Disbarment of Hennings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Disbarment of Hennings, 283 N.W.2d 896, 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1646 (Mich. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This disbarment proceeding arises out of 27 complaints against respondent involving deceits, falsehood, misrepresentation, forgeries, conversions, and other fraudulent acts culminating in conviction in Hennepin County District Court on July 31, 1978, of one count of theft by trick of over $2,500 and conviction in Ramsey County District Court on November 9, 1978, of four counts of theft of over $2,500, each conviction *897 based upon pleas of guilty. Respondent is now confined at Stillwater State Prison pursuant to sentences imposed for these crimes.

Respondent does not contest the grounds for discipline but has urged upon us that he be indefinitely suspended rather than disbarred, based upon a fundamental change in his life and his purpose of now dedicating his life to the Christian ministry. We in no sense dismiss these representations out of hand but are not persuaded that his continuance as a lawyer is essential to his goal of becoming a chaplain in an institutional ministry. More important, our obligation to the profession of law and the judicial system compels a conclusion, on this record, that disbarment is mandated.

Accordingly, respondent, Roger Charles Hennings, is herewith disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Shoemaker
518 N.W.2d 552 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1994)
Matter of Discipline of Ray
408 N.W.2d 581 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1987)
Matter of Discipline of Okerman
310 N.W.2d 568 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 N.W.2d 896, 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-disbarment-of-hennings-minn-1979.