In re the Detention of Thomas G. Ruthers, Jr.

Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided April 26, 2019·No. 17-1539·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 17–1539

Mahaska County No. CVEQ087132 ORDER

IN RE THE DETENTION OF THOMAS G. RUTHERS JR.

THOMAS G. RUTHERS JR., Respondent-Appellant.

The court, McDonald, J., taking no part, being evenly divided, declares this case affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2017).

Waterman, Mansfield, and Christensen, JJ., would affirm the judgment of the district court; Cady, C.J., and Wiggins and Appel, JJ., would reverse the judgment of the district court. See State v. Effler, 769 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]hen the supreme court is equally divided on an issue upon which the district court and court of appeals differ, the decision of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.”). Copies to:

Michael H. Adams Spd - Special Defense Unit 401 East Court Avenue, Suite 150 Des Moines, IA 50319

Tyler Buller Assistant Attorney General Hoover Building, 2nd Floor Des Moines, IA 50319

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Detention of Thomas G. Ruthers, Jr., (iowa 2019).

In re the Detention of Thomas G. Ruthers, Jr. (In re the Detention of Thomas G. Ruthers, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Effler
769 N.W.2d 880 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2009)