In re the Detention of Galen Kendrick Shaffer
This text of In re the Detention of Galen Kendrick Shaffer (In re the Detention of Galen Kendrick Shaffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 18-0390 Filed January 23, 2019
IN RE THE DETENTION OF GALEN KENDRICK SHAFFER,
GALEN KENDRICK SHAFFER, Respondent-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Kellyann M.
Lekar, Judge.
Respondent appeals the district court’s order for continuing commitment.
AFFIRMED.
Thomas J. Gaul, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Tyler J. Buller, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee State.
Considered by Vogel, C.J., and Vaitheswaran and McDonald, JJ. 2
VOGEL, Chief Judge.
Respondent Galen Shaffer appeals the district court’s order of continuing
civil commitment under Iowa Code chapter 299A (2017). On our review for
corrections of errors at law, see In re Detention of Altman, 723 N.W.2d 181, 184
(Iowa 2006), we affirm.
Shaffer has a long history of sexually violent offenses dating back to 1991.
The district court, after a detailed recitation of Shaffer’s numerous previous orders
of confinement, found the State had proven beyond a reasonable doubt “that the
respondent’s mental abnormality remains such that he is likely to engage in
predatory acts that constitute sexually violent offenses if discharged and/or that
the respondent is not suitable for placement in a transitional release program
pursuant to [Iowa Code] section 229A.8A.”
On appeal, Shaffer asserts the district court “ignores the facts presented.”
However, the district court took the reports from both Shaffer’s expert and the
State’s expert into consideration, discussing the findings of each. The district court
determined the State’s expert’s report was “more credible and reliable than
[Shaffer’s expert]” and “more consistent with other credible evidence.”
We agree and affirm without further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R.21.26(1)(b),
(d), (e).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re the Detention of Galen Kendrick Shaffer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-detention-of-galen-kendrick-shaffer-iowactapp-2019.