In Re the Detention of Bellamy

135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 672, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 381
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 8, 1926·Published

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The appeal must be dismissed, for the reason, that, except in cases concerning the care and custody of children, no appeal lies from a judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding refusing to discharge a person from custody or confinement, but the remedy, if any, in such a case, is by petition for a writ of certiorari, which is addressed to the sound discretion of the appellate court. S. v. Edwards, ante, 321; In re McCade, 183 N. C., 242; In re Croom, 175 N. C., 455.

While -this course must be pursued, we deem it not amiss to say that a careful examination of the record, considering it as on writ of certiorari (S. v. Hooker, 183 N. C., 763), discloses no error on the part of the learned judge who heard the matter below.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Detention of Bellamy, 135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 672, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 381 (N.C. 1926).

135 S.E. 927 (In Re the Detention of Bellamy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Croom
95 S.E. 903 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)
State v. . Hooker
111 S.E. 351 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
In Re McCade
111 S.E. 3 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)