In re the Designation of Travis

184 A.D. 505, 171 N.Y.S. 1052, 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6138
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 23, 1918·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Thomas, J.:

I vote to reverse upon the ground that the office of the Secretary of State is common to the State, and is not limited to the county of Albany; and that when the Secretary of State receives a petition, his function and act are not confined [506] within the county of Albany, but operate and extend through the whole State. Hence no authentication by the county clerk of the notary’s certificate is required, nor has it been practiced or regarded as necessary in filing papers with the Secretary of State where certification by a notary public or similar officer is demanded. If the verification of the petition be regarded as an acknowledgment, still no further form seems to be required either for that, or for a declination by the person designated, or for filling a vacancy. (Election Law [Consol. Laws, chap. 17; Laws of 1909, chap. 22], §§ 50, 52.)*

Putnam, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Designation of Travis, 184 A.D. 505, 171 N.Y.S. 1052, 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

184 A.D. 505 (In re the Designation of Travis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Bond & Mortgage Guarantee Co.
169 Misc. 522 (New York Supreme Court, 1938)
Salzman v. Attrean
142 Misc. 245 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1931)
Maguire v. Reiss
139 Misc. 886 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1931)
Bessan v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport
135 Misc. 368 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1929)
O'Keeffe v. Dugan
185 A.D. 53 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)