In Re the Custody of Gupton

77 S.E.2d 716, 238 N.C. 303, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 435
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 30, 1953
Docket106
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 77 S.E.2d 716 (In Re the Custody of Gupton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Custody of Gupton, 77 S.E.2d 716, 238 N.C. 303, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 435 (N.C. 1953).

Opinion

Ervin, J.

The law of the land clause embodied in Article I, Section 17, of the North Carolina Constitution guarantees to the litigant in every kind of judicial proceeding the right to an adequate and fair hearing before he can be deprived of his claim or defense by judicial decree. Eason v. Spence, 232 N.C. 579, 61 S.E. 2d 717; Surety Corp. v. Sharpe, 232 N.C. 98, 59 S.E. 2d 593.

Where the claim or defense turns upon a factual adjudication, the constitutional right of the litigant to an adequate and fair hearing requires that he be apprised of all the evidence received by the court and given an opportunity to test, explain, or rebut it. In re Edwards’ Estate, 234 *305 N.C. 202, 66 S.E. 2d 675; S. v. Gordon, 225 N.C. 241, 34 S.E. 2d 414; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 227 U.S. 88, 33 S. Ct. 185, 57 L. Ed. 431.

Tbe judgment sets at naught the petitioner’s constitutional right to an adequate and fair hearing. It deprives him of his claim to the custody of his daughter upon a factual adjudication based in substantial part upon evidence of an unrevealed nature gathered by the presiding judge in secret from undisclosed sources without his knowledge or that of his counsel.

The judgment is set aside and the proceeding is remanded to the Superior Court of Nash County to the end that it may be heard anew agreeably to the law of the land.

Error and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re R.S.H.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2022
In re: C.D.G.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2021
Houston v. Town of Chapel Hill
630 S.E.2d 249 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
Hummel v. University of North Carolina
576 S.E.2d 124 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)
Smitheman Ex Rel. Godwin v. National Presto Industries, Inc.
428 S.E.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Frizzelle v. Harnett County
416 S.E.2d 421 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1992)
State v. Jones
415 S.E.2d 774 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1992)
Matter of Alamance County Ct. Facilities
405 S.E.2d 125 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1991)
In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 121 Greene
403 S.E.2d 257 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1991)
People v. Handcock
145 Cal. App. Supp. 3d 25 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1983)
Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.
300 S.E.2d 241 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)
In Re: Joseph Lee Moore
221 S.E.2d 307 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976)
Horton v. Horton
183 S.E.2d 794 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
In Re the Custody of Griffin
170 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro
165 S.E.2d 490 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1969)
Shepherd v. Shepherd
159 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
Mazur v. Lazarus
196 A.2d 477 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1964)
In Re Wilson
126 S.E.2d 489 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
McGuire v. McGuire
140 So. 2d 354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Kesseler v. Kesseler
180 N.E.2d 402 (New York Court of Appeals, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.E.2d 716, 238 N.C. 303, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-custody-of-gupton-nc-1953.