In re the County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the County of Suffolk

38 A.D.2d 753, 330 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5484

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 753 (In re the County of Suffolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the County of Suffolk, 38 A.D.2d 753, 330 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, claimant Alice B. Weidemann appeals from an order of the Supreme Court,. Suffolk County-, dated October 26, 1970, which denied a nation, by her and another claimant to examine and discover public records maintained by the County of Suffolk. Order modified by adding to the decretal paragraph thereof, immediately after the word “denied”, the following: “except that discovery and inspection is granted to claimant Alice B. Weidemimn of (!) the. public'traffic count for the five years preceding the 1968 taking %nd (2) the plans of development relating to the development of Commack Road — suc& discovery and inspection to take place at the locations of these documents.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, appellant is entitled to discovery and inspection of the above-mentioned public traffic count? and plans of development because these documents are public records. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding, claimant Alice B. Weidemann appeals from an order of the Supreme Court,. Suffolk County-, dated October 26, 1970, which denied a nation, by her and another claimant to examine and discover public records maintained by the County of Suffolk. Order modified by adding to the decretal paragraph thereof, immediately after the word “denied”, the following: “except that discovery and inspection is granted to claimant Alice B. Weidemimn of (!) the. public'traffic count for the five years preceding the 1968 taking %nd (2) the plans of development relating to the development of Commack Road — suc& discovery and inspection to take place at the locations of these documents.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, appellant is entitled to discovery and inspection of the above-mentioned public traffic count? and plans of development because these documents are public records. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 753, 330 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-county-of-suffolk-nyappdiv-1972.