In re the Contested Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Oakley

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Contested Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Oakley

113 Misc. 135

DecidedSeptember 15, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 113 Misc. 135 (In re the Contested Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Oakley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Contested Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Oakley, 113 Misc. 135 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Slater, S.

The contestants seek án ex parte order for the examination before trial of the petitioner in the proceeding to probate the will of decedent, under sections 872 and 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The issues were joined by order dated September 7, 1920, and the matter is on the October calendar for trial by jury.

Under the express provision of section 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure the surrogate is empowered to grant such an order in the exercise of his discretion. People ex rel. Lewis v. Fowler, 229 N. Y. 84. The proposed order as submitted requires the examination of the proponent upon the following matters:

1. That the said instrument is not the last will and testament of the decedent.

2. That said will was not executed as required by law.

3. That decedent was of unsound mind.

4. That the execution of the will was obtained by undue influence.

There are certain differences between an examination of an adverse party after issues are joined, to obtain evidence for use at the trial, and an examination in order to frame a complaint. The true purpose of examination after issues are joined is to develop the truth.

The first and second issues herein may be proven or disproven by the witnesses to the will. The third issue may be proven or disproven by witnesses other than the proponent. Therefore, the examination after issues are joined and before trial can only avail as to the issue of undue influence. On the trial every opportunity is afforded to elicit all the facts in an [137]*137orderly way, and to develop the truth. I am of the opinion that any information that may be obtained before trial after joinder of issues, can just as well be obtained from the witness upon the trial of the proceeding before me and a jury, at the October term, to be heard within a few days. The petitioner is a party to the proceedings and before the court, and can be made to personally attend the trial.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slater, S.

The contestants seek án ex parte order for the examination before trial of the petitioner in the proceeding to probate the will of decedent, under sections 872 and 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The issues were joined by order dated September 7, 1920, and the matter is on the October calendar for trial by jury.

Under the express provision of section 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure the surrogate is empowered to grant such an order in the exercise of his discretion. People ex rel. Lewis v. Fowler, 229 N. Y. 84. The proposed order as submitted requires the examination of the proponent upon the following matters:

1. That the said instrument is not the last will and testament of the decedent.

2. That said will was not executed as required by law.

3. That decedent was of unsound mind.

4. That the execution of the will was obtained by undue influence.

There are certain differences between an examination of an adverse party after issues are joined, to obtain evidence for use at the trial, and an examination in order to frame a complaint. The true purpose of examination after issues are joined is to develop the truth.

The first and second issues herein may be proven or disproven by the witnesses to the will. The third issue may be proven or disproven by witnesses other than the proponent. Therefore, the examination after issues are joined and before trial can only avail as to the issue of undue influence. On the trial every opportunity is afforded to elicit all the facts in an [137]*137orderly way, and to develop the truth. I am of the opinion that any information that may be obtained before trial after joinder of issues, can just as well be obtained from the witness upon the trial of the proceeding before me and a jury, at the October term, to be heard within a few days. The petitioner is a party to the proceedings and before the court, and can be made to personally attend the trial.

Decreed accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 Misc. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-contested-probate-of-the-last-will-testament-of-oakley-nysurct-1920.

Opinion

2. That said will was not executed as required by law.

3. That decedent was of unsound mind.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack