In re the Construction of an Indenture of Trust Made by Vanderbilt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Construction of an Indenture of Trust Made by Vanderbilt

277 A.D.2d 785

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 785 (In re the Construction of an Indenture of Trust Made by Vanderbilt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Construction of an Indenture of Trust Made by Vanderbilt, 277 A.D.2d 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 79 of the Civil Practice Act, the order (1) directs trustees to account; (2) construes certain indemnity agreements relating to an inter vivos trust agreement; (3) declares certain rights of trustees under the indemnity agreements; (4) denies the motion of presumptive remaindermen of the trust to dismiss the petition; (5) grants, without prejudice, motions to dismiss an affirmative defense, cross claims, and cross petitions set forth in the answer of the remaindermen; and (6) retains jurisdiction of the proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, with [786]*786$10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See post, p. 901.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 79 of the Civil Practice Act, the order (1) directs trustees to account; (2) construes certain indemnity agreements relating to an inter vivos trust agreement; (3) declares certain rights of trustees under the indemnity agreements; (4) denies the motion of presumptive remaindermen of the trust to dismiss the petition; (5) grants, without prejudice, motions to dismiss an affirmative defense, cross claims, and cross petitions set forth in the answer of the remaindermen; and (6) retains jurisdiction of the proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, with [786]*786$10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See post, p. 901.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-construction-of-an-indenture-of-trust-made-by-vanderbilt-nyappdiv-1950.